RH Wiki:Policy: Difference between revisions

RH Wiki:Policy (view source)

Revision as of 22:06, 17 August 2012

770 bytes added , 17 August 2012

no edit summary

PaperScarf

Bureaucrats, Administrators

648

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-There are very few '''policies''' which apply across all Wikia. These can be found on the Central Wikia at [[Wikia:Category:Policy]].
+==What Rhythm Heaven Wiki is About and What We Expect==
+Rhythm Heaven Wiki is a place where those who are fans of Rhythm Heaven can gather and share their knowledge of the series. We have two goals: The first being the best site to get accurate information on everything and anything to know about the official Rhythm Heaven series, and the second to form a friendly community where fans can gather and discuss with one another, about the series or not.
+===What We Expect:===
+Like the very first Wiki that has originated, we would like to keep the tone in the articles more on the formal side. This will help keep our pages more accurate and less biased, and its just overall easier to read and understand.
-Other policies for this Wikia should be decided by the wiki community. It's generally best to keep policies as simple as possible, and not to introduce too many rules. A growing wiki can usually do well with a few simple policies and a lot of goodwill and cooperation.
-Adding <code><nowiki>[[Category:Policy]]</nowiki></code> to any policy pages will add them to the policy category. This is found [[:Category:Policy|here]].
+===What We '''DO NOT''' Expect:===
+*As a wiki dedicated to the original series, we do not accept fan art on any articles or main pages. Please try to find the official artwork for adding photos to pages.
-[[Category:Policy|*]]
+*Any biased or influential comments in any way that express your opinion on something. Again, we are only looking for true, raw information on the games.  '''Example of a no-no:''' "Chorus Kids is a funny game." '''Exceptions:''' If the opinionated comment or rating is quoted by a popular game review site such as IGN or something said by a game developer. These are okay because they are not comments influenced by the editor of the article.